ext_270297 ([identity profile] ericakeithley.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] puzzle_me 2006-07-20 01:09 am (UTC)

I think that the question of whether the blastocyst is human life or not is more a philosophic question than a biological question. Pro-lifers believe that human life begins at conception. That thought doesn't have much to do with what the arrangement of cell(s) looks like at that point or later in its development.

If you don't think that the blastocyst is human life, when does the embryo/fetus become human and why?

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting