ext_242832 ([identity profile] pearmeson.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] puzzle_me 2006-07-20 03:37 pm (UTC)

Though I think for a pro-lifer, the violinist argument would only be helpful in justifying a rape/incest exemption. They would argue that consensual sex corresponds to informed consent to the violinist arrangement, and that one can't back out of a deal like that.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting